firewall: Let a reply come back through another of our gateways for an unsafe network

This commit is contained in:
JackDoan committed 2026-10-16 16:32:46 -05:00
1 parent a0045aef09
commit 56a1a94a54
4 files changed
+231 -1

No files matched your search

+103
View File
@@ -1053,6 +1053,109 @@ func TestFirewall_ConntrackUnsafeNetworkPeers(t *testing.T) {
}
}
// fakeSiblings maps each gateway to the conntrack peers of the gateways it shares a route with
type fakeSiblings map[*HostInfo][]netip.Addr
func (s fakeSiblings) siblingPeers(_ netip.Addr, h *HostInfo, buf []netip.Addr) []netip.Addr {
return append(buf, s[h]...)
}
func TestFirewall_ConntrackGatewaySiblings(t *testing.T) {
l := test.NewLoggerWithOutput(&bytes.Buffer{})
myVpnNetworksTable := new(bart.Lite)
myVpnNetworksTable.Insert(netip.MustParsePrefix("192.0.2.1/24"))
owner := &dummyCert{
name: "owner",
networks: []netip.Prefix{netip.MustParsePrefix("192.0.2.1/24")},
}
// Routers for the same unsafe network. a and b are both our gateways for it, c only claims it in its cert
router := func(name string, addr string, groups ...string) *HostInfo {
inverted := map[string]struct{}{}
for _, g := range groups {
inverted[g] = struct{}{}
}
c := &cert.CachedCertificate{
Certificate: &dummyCert{
name: name,
groups: groups,
networks: []netip.Prefix{netip.MustParsePrefix(addr + "/24")},
unsafeNetworks: []netip.Prefix{netip.MustParsePrefix("198.51.100.0/24")},
},
InvertedGroups: inverted,
}
h := &HostInfo{
ConnectionState: &ConnectionState{peerCert: c},
vpnAddrs: []netip.Addr{netip.MustParseAddr(addr)},
}
h.buildNetworks(myVpnNetworksTable, c.Certificate)
return h
}
a := router("a", "192.0.2.2", "trusted")
b := router("b", "192.0.2.3", "trusted")
c := router("c", "192.0.2.4", "trusted")
siblings := fakeSiblings{a: {b.vpnAddrs[0]}, b: {a.vpnAddrs[0]}}
cp := cert.NewCAPool()
flow := firewall.Packet{
LocalAddr: netip.MustParseAddr("192.0.2.1"),
RemoteAddr: netip.MustParseAddr("198.51.100.5"),
LocalPort: 55000,
RemotePort: 443,
Protocol: iputil.IPProtocolTCP,
}
// We open flows through our gateways, nothing is allowed in on its own
newFirewall := func(outGroup string) *Firewall {
fw := NewFirewall(l, time.Second, time.Minute, time.Hour, owner)
require.NoError(t, fw.AddRule(false, firewall.ProtoAny, 0, 0, []string{outGroup}, "", "", "", "", ""))
fw.siblings = siblings
return fw
}
t.Run("reply through the other gateway", func(t *testing.T) {
fw := newFirewall("trusted")
require.NoError(t, fw.Drop(flow, false, b, cp, nil))
require.NoError(t, fw.Drop(flow, true, a, cp, nil))
// a has its own entry now, and keeps the flow when b's is gone
delete(fw.Conntrack.Conns, firewall.ConntrackKey{Packet: flow, Peer: b.vpnAddrs[0]})
require.NoError(t, fw.Drop(flow, true, a, cp, nil))
})
t.Run("not our gateway", func(t *testing.T) {
fw := newFirewall("trusted")
require.NoError(t, fw.Drop(flow, false, b, cp, nil))
assert.Equal(t, ErrNoMatchingRule, fw.Drop(flow, true, c, cp, nil))
})
t.Run("off without siblings", func(t *testing.T) {
fw := newFirewall("trusted")
fw.siblings = nil
require.NoError(t, fw.Drop(flow, false, b, cp, nil))
assert.Equal(t, ErrNoMatchingRule, fw.Drop(flow, true, a, cp, nil))
})
t.Run("expired sibling entry", func(t *testing.T) {
fw := newFirewall("trusted")
require.NoError(t, fw.Drop(flow, false, b, cp, nil))
fw.Conntrack.Conns[firewall.ConntrackKey{Packet: flow, Peer: b.vpnAddrs[0]}].Expires = time.Now().Add(-time.Second)
assert.Equal(t, ErrNoMatchingRule, fw.Drop(flow, true, a, cp, nil))
})
t.Run("the original rules must allow the new gateway", func(t *testing.T) {
fw := newFirewall("b-only")
b.ConnectionState.peerCert.InvertedGroups["b-only"] = struct{}{}
defer delete(b.ConnectionState.peerCert.InvertedGroups, "b-only")
require.NoError(t, fw.Drop(flow, false, b, cp, nil))
assert.Equal(t, ErrNoMatchingRule, fw.Drop(flow, true, a, cp, nil))
})
}
func TestFirewall_ConntrackPeerRehandshake(t *testing.T) {
l := test.NewLoggerWithOutput(&bytes.Buffer{})