mirror of
https://github.com/slackhq/nebula.git
synced 2026-11-15 19:06:52 +01:00
185 lines
6.0 KiB
Go
185 lines
6.0 KiB
Go
package nebula
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"net/netip"
|
|
"testing"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/gaissmai/bart"
|
|
"github.com/slackhq/nebula/cert"
|
|
"github.com/slackhq/nebula/config"
|
|
"github.com/slackhq/nebula/overlay/overlaytest"
|
|
"github.com/slackhq/nebula/routing"
|
|
"github.com/slackhq/nebula/test"
|
|
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
|
|
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// TestReloadFirewall_CertUnsafeNetworksChanged verifies that reloadFirewall
|
|
// rebuilds the firewall when only the certificate's UnsafeNetworks have changed,
|
|
// even if the firewall section of the YAML has not.
|
|
func TestReloadFirewall_CertUnsafeNetworksChanged(t *testing.T) {
|
|
l := test.NewLogger()
|
|
|
|
vpnNet := netip.MustParsePrefix("10.0.0.1/24")
|
|
initialUnsafe := []netip.Prefix{netip.MustParsePrefix("198.51.100.0/24")}
|
|
|
|
// dummyCert avoids dragging the real signing pipeline into a unit test.
|
|
c1 := &dummyCert{
|
|
version: cert.Version2,
|
|
networks: []netip.Prefix{vpnNet},
|
|
unsafeNetworks: initialUnsafe,
|
|
}
|
|
pki := &PKI{}
|
|
pki.cs.Store(&CertState{v2Cert: c1, initiatingVersion: cert.Version2})
|
|
|
|
rawYAML := `firewall:
|
|
outbound:
|
|
- port: any
|
|
proto: any
|
|
host: any
|
|
inbound:
|
|
- port: any
|
|
proto: any
|
|
host: any
|
|
`
|
|
cfg := config.NewC(l)
|
|
require.NoError(t, cfg.LoadString(rawYAML))
|
|
|
|
fw, err := NewFirewallFromConfig(l, pki.getCertState(), cfg)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.Equal(t, initialUnsafe, fw.unsafeNetworks)
|
|
|
|
f := &Interface{
|
|
pki: pki,
|
|
firewall: fw,
|
|
l: l,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Swap the cert with a different UnsafeNetworks set.
|
|
newUnsafe := []netip.Prefix{
|
|
netip.MustParsePrefix("198.51.100.0/24"),
|
|
netip.MustParsePrefix("203.0.113.0/24"),
|
|
}
|
|
c2 := &dummyCert{
|
|
version: cert.Version2,
|
|
networks: []netip.Prefix{vpnNet},
|
|
unsafeNetworks: newUnsafe,
|
|
}
|
|
pki.cs.Store(&CertState{v2Cert: c2, initiatingVersion: cert.Version2})
|
|
|
|
// Reload with the same YAML so HasChanged("firewall") reports false.
|
|
require.NoError(t, cfg.ReloadConfigString(rawYAML).Err)
|
|
require.False(t, cfg.HasChanged("firewall"))
|
|
|
|
f.reloadFirewall(cfg, nil)
|
|
|
|
assert.NotSame(t, fw, f.firewall, "firewall pointer should have been replaced")
|
|
assert.Equal(t, newUnsafe, f.firewall.unsafeNetworks)
|
|
assert.True(t, f.firewall.routableNetworks.Contains(netip.MustParseAddr("203.0.113.5")))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestReloadFirewall_NoChange verifies that reloadFirewall is a no-op when
|
|
// neither the firewall config nor the cert's UnsafeNetworks have changed.
|
|
func TestReloadFirewall_NoChange(t *testing.T) {
|
|
l := test.NewLogger()
|
|
|
|
vpnNet := netip.MustParsePrefix("10.0.0.1/24")
|
|
unsafe := []netip.Prefix{netip.MustParsePrefix("198.51.100.0/24")}
|
|
|
|
c1 := &dummyCert{
|
|
version: cert.Version2,
|
|
networks: []netip.Prefix{vpnNet},
|
|
unsafeNetworks: unsafe,
|
|
}
|
|
pki := &PKI{}
|
|
pki.cs.Store(&CertState{v2Cert: c1, initiatingVersion: cert.Version2})
|
|
|
|
rawYAML := `firewall:
|
|
outbound:
|
|
- port: any
|
|
proto: any
|
|
host: any
|
|
inbound:
|
|
- port: any
|
|
proto: any
|
|
host: any
|
|
`
|
|
cfg := config.NewC(l)
|
|
require.NoError(t, cfg.LoadString(rawYAML))
|
|
|
|
fw, err := NewFirewallFromConfig(l, pki.getCertState(), cfg)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
f := &Interface{
|
|
pki: pki,
|
|
firewall: fw,
|
|
l: l,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, cfg.ReloadConfigString(rawYAML).Err)
|
|
f.reloadFirewall(cfg, nil)
|
|
|
|
assert.Same(t, fw, f.firewall, "firewall should not have been replaced")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Rules that don't parse keep the old firewall, and the reload says it could not apply them
|
|
func TestReloadFirewall_BadRulesFailTheReload(t *testing.T) {
|
|
l := test.NewLogger()
|
|
pki := &PKI{}
|
|
pki.cs.Store(&CertState{v2Cert: &dummyCert{version: cert.Version2, networks: []netip.Prefix{netip.MustParsePrefix("10.0.0.1/24")}}, initiatingVersion: cert.Version2})
|
|
|
|
rules := func(proto string) string {
|
|
return "firewall:\n outbound:\n - port: any\n proto: any\n host: any\n inbound:\n - port: any\n proto: " + proto + "\n host: any\n"
|
|
}
|
|
cfg := config.NewC(l)
|
|
require.NoError(t, cfg.LoadString(rules("any")))
|
|
fw, err := NewFirewallFromConfig(l, pki.getCertState(), cfg)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
f := &Interface{pki: pki, firewall: fw, l: l}
|
|
cfg.RegisterReloadCallback(f.reloadFirewall)
|
|
|
|
res := cfg.ReloadConfigString(rules("nope"))
|
|
require.NoError(t, res.Err)
|
|
assert.True(t, res.Failed)
|
|
assert.Same(t, fw, f.firewall)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// routesTun is a NoopTun with a route table
|
|
type routesTun struct {
|
|
overlaytest.NoopTun
|
|
routes *bart.Table[routing.Gateways]
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (t routesTun) RoutesFor(ip netip.Addr) routing.Gateways {
|
|
r, _ := t.routes.Lookup(ip)
|
|
return r
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestInterface_SiblingPeers(t *testing.T) {
|
|
addr := netip.MustParseAddr
|
|
routes := new(bart.Table[routing.Gateways])
|
|
// a and b carry 198.51.100.0/24, the route names b by its v6 address
|
|
routes.Insert(netip.MustParsePrefix("198.51.100.0/24"), routing.Gateways{
|
|
routing.NewGateway(addr("192.0.2.2"), 1),
|
|
routing.NewGateway(addr("fd00::3"), 1),
|
|
routing.NewGateway(addr("192.0.2.5"), 1), // no tunnel to this one
|
|
})
|
|
routes.Insert(netip.MustParsePrefix("203.0.113.0/24"), routing.Gateways{routing.NewGateway(addr("192.0.2.2"), 1)})
|
|
|
|
hm := newHostMap(test.NewLogger())
|
|
a := &HostInfo{vpnAddrs: []netip.Addr{addr("192.0.2.2"), addr("fd00::2")}, localIndexId: 1}
|
|
b := &HostInfo{vpnAddrs: []netip.Addr{addr("192.0.2.3"), addr("fd00::3")}, localIndexId: 2}
|
|
c := &HostInfo{vpnAddrs: []netip.Addr{addr("192.0.2.4")}, localIndexId: 3}
|
|
for _, h := range []*HostInfo{a, b, c} {
|
|
hm.unlockedAddHostInfo(h, &Interface{})
|
|
}
|
|
f := &Interface{inside: routesTun{routes: routes}, hostMap: hm}
|
|
|
|
// Siblings come back as their first vpn address, the one conntrack keys on, whichever address the route names
|
|
assert.Equal(t, []netip.Addr{addr("192.0.2.3")}, f.siblingPeers(addr("198.51.100.5"), a, nil))
|
|
assert.Equal(t, []netip.Addr{addr("192.0.2.2")}, f.siblingPeers(addr("198.51.100.5"), b, nil))
|
|
assert.Empty(t, f.siblingPeers(addr("198.51.100.5"), c, nil), "not one of our gateways for the network")
|
|
assert.Empty(t, f.siblingPeers(addr("203.0.113.5"), a, nil), "a single gateway route has no siblings")
|
|
assert.Empty(t, f.siblingPeers(addr("192.0.2.3"), a, nil), "no route")
|
|
}
|